In the high-stakes world of Formula 1, few moments define a championship like the split-second decisions that swing races. At the 2025 Mexican Grand Prix, Oscar Piastri suffered a heartbreaking 0.6-second delay during a critical pit stop, courtesy of McLaren’s strategy call that prioritized teammate Lando Norris. This “betrayal,” as fans dubbed it, has ignited fury over the team’s apparent favoritism toward their British “Golden Boy.”

Piastri, the unflappable Australian rookie turned title contender, entered Mexico leading Norris by a slender margin after a dominant Singapore showing. Yet, McLaren’s radio instructions kept Piastri queued behind Norris in the pit lane, costing him vital seconds on fresh tires. He crossed the line in fifth, while Norris claimed victory and the championship lead—by just one point.
The incident echoes a pattern that’s plagued McLaren’s garage all season. In Singapore, Norris aggressively overtook Piastri on lap one, making contact without yielding the position despite Piastri’s pleas over team radio. No penalty followed, fueling whispers of bias that 1978 champion Mario Andretti publicly endorsed, calling it “blatant favoritism” without clear rationale.

McLaren’s leadership, including CEO Zak Brown, has downplayed the claims, insisting both drivers receive equal resources. Yet, data from onboard telemetry reveals Norris benefiting from softer compound allocations in qualifying sessions more often than Piastri—subtle edges that compound over 24 races. Fans on social media erupted, labeling Norris the “protected asset” in a Woking dynasty built on British hope.
Piastri’s composure masks deeper frustration. Post-Mexico, he told reporters, “We’re a team, but championships aren’t won by waiting in line.” His 356 points trail Norris’s 357, with only four races left and 116 points up for grabs. Verstappen lurks 36 points back, ready to pounce if McLaren’s internal rift widens.

This favoritism isn’t new; echoes trace to Hungary, where Norris’s one-stop gamble denied Piastri a win, despite the Australian’s superior pace on worn tires. Critics argue McLaren grooms Norris as the marketable face, leveraging his McLaren academy roots and home-nation appeal. Piastri, the outsider prodigy, pays the price in lost opportunities.
Team principal Andrea Stella admitted in a recent interview that Piastri was “never the initial priority,” a slip that stunned observers and amplified sabotage theories. While not outright admission, it underscores a hierarchy where Norris’s youth and flair eclipse Piastri’s calculated brilliance.
The fallout extends beyond the track. Sponsor inquiries have spiked, questioning McLaren’s unity as they chase constructors’ glory with 713 points. Ferrari and Mercedes close in, their 356 and 355 tallies a stark reminder of vulnerability.

Piastri’s resilience shines through adversity. His pole in Mexico qualifying showcased raw talent undimmed by politics. Yet, as Austin looms, the 0.6-second sting lingers—a symbol of how favoritism erodes trust and titles.
If McLaren doesn’t recalibrate, Piastri’s championship dream could shatter on the altar of loyalty to their golden child. In F1, where milliseconds rule, betrayal by 0.6 seconds might be the cruelest margin of all.
Norris, ever diplomatic, dismissed the drama: “Oscar’s my toughest rival, full stop.” But actions speak louder; his post-race celebrations masked the shadow of doubt cast over his lead.
As the season hurtles toward Abu Dhabi, Piastri must channel this injustice into fire. McLaren’s soul-searching could decide not just a driver crown, but the team’s legacy in an era demanding fairness.
